Coinbase withdrew its support for landmark Senate crypto legislation just hours before a scheduled committee vote on Tuesday, forcing lawmakers to postpone consideration of the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act and throwing the future of federal digital asset regulation into doubt.
In a surprise reversal on Jan. 14, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the bill’s last-minute amendments, including restrictions on tokenized securities and decentralized finance would do more harm than the current regulatory uncertainty.
“We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” Armstrong wrote on social media.
The postponement marks a significant setback for what had been positioned as the most comprehensive attempt in years to establish clear rules for the US crypto industry, and it underscores deep divisions over how digital assets should be regulated.
Coinbase faults key provisions, warns on innovation
At the heart of Coinbase’s objections are a series of last-minute amendments that executives say would curb growth in key segments of the crypto economy.
The exchange chief flagged what he described as an effective ban on tokenized equities, sweeping restrictions on decentralized finance (DeFi) activity, and broad government access to private financial records.
Industry insiders also pointed to concerns that the bill shifts regulatory power away from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), traditionally viewed by many crypto firms as a more favourable regulator, toward the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has taken a more aggressive enforcement posture in recent years.
“It would materially weaken the role of the CFTC and enable the SEC to exert undue control over digital assets,” said one crypto policy analyst.
Supporters of the bill have argued that without clear rules, the United States risks driving innovation offshore and forcing crypto companies to operate in more permissive jurisdictions.
Peter Van Valkenburgh, executive director of a leading crypto policy think tank, said he remains optimistic that bipartisan compromise is still possible. Legal certainty is critical for investment and innovation to flourish, Van Valkenburgh said in a statement.
Lawmakers recalibrate amid political crosscurrents
Senate Banking Committee leadership announced the postponement of Thursday’s markup session after the Coinbase announcement, making remarks that the bill’s future hinges on further negotiation among legislators, industry stakeholders, and regulators.
“Leaders from both sides are engaged in continued discussions,” said a spokesperson for Committee Chair
While Scott told reporters he still expects to advance some form of crypto legislation this session, he acknowledged that significant revisions will be required to secure broader support.
Some Democratic lawmakers have expressed frustration with the delay but say they remain committed to a framework that balances investor protection with innovation.
Others, particularly those with concerns about banking sector influence, have warned against provisions they see as favoring traditional financial institutions over emerging Web3 firms.
Market and industry fallout
The sudden shift in Coinbase’s stance has already had measurable market effects. Coinbase’s own stock pulled back in after-hours trading following the announcement, and analysts say the delay in regulatory clarity could weigh on broader market sentiment.
For many in the crypto community, the episode indicates a broader tension: the need for clear, enforceable rules on digital assets versus the risk that poorly crafted legislation could stifle innovation.
As lawmakers prepare to revisit the draft, industry watchers will be closely monitoring whether the Senate can bridge the policy divide and whether Coinbase’s stance galvanises other stakeholders to push for a more balanced regulatory approach.