- Trending
- Comments
- Latest
Tennessee lawmakers have advanced legislation that would authorize the state treasury to invest up to 10% of eligible public funds in bitcoin, positioning the state among a growing number exploring cryptocurrency reserve strategies.
House Bill 1695, known as the Tennessee Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act, has been referred to committee review and could make Tennessee one of the first U.S. states to formally hold bitcoin as part of its official financial reserves a move likely to draw significant attention from institutional investors and crypto advocates nationwide.
Filed by State Rep. Jody Barrett (R-Dickson), the bill has been referred to the government operations committee and awaits review by the House Finance, Ways and Means Committee.
Under its terms, the State Treasurer would be empowered to invest up to 10% of eligible public funds, including the general fund and revenue fluctuation reserve, into Bitcoin.
With annual purchases capped at 5% of the fiscal year’s eligible pool until the 10% limit is reached.
Proponents portray the move as a prudent diversification strategy amid persistent inflation pressures and low yields on traditional assets.
“This is about responsible stewardship of public finances.”
Rep. Barrett said, comparing Bitcoin to gold and framing it as a long-term hedge against eroding purchasing power.
Tennessee’s proposal echoes similar efforts across the U.S., where legislators in states such as Kansas and South Dakota have introduced bills to permit Bitcoin reserve allocations or broader digital asset funds.
In Kansas, lawmakers have floated a strategic Bitcoin reserve approach that would fund a state crypto reserve using unclaimed digital assets and accrued staking rewards, a distinct model for sourcing funds without tapping traditional tax dollars.
Industry analysts view this patchwork of proposals as part of a broader movement toward integrating digital assets in public finance.
Maria Cheng, senior research analyst at Blockchain Institute, analysed that many states are seeing Bitcoin not just as a technology play but as an inflation-resilient asset.
She also noted that this shift could influence how institutional investors and sovereign entities view crypto exposure.
“State-level adoption sends a strong signal to market participants about confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term role.” Maria Cheng, Senior Research Analyst, Blockchain Institute.
In addition to reserve legislation, local regulatory adjustments are underway. For example, the city of Kingsport, Tennessee, recently updated zoning rules to facilitate cryptocurrency mining and data centre operations.
While proponents highlight Bitcoin’s fixed supply and global liquidity as advantages, critics caution lawmakers about the volatility inherent in crypto markets and the prudence of deploying public funds into assets that can swing double-digit percentages within a short timeframe.
“This kind of strategy requires robust risk controls and transparency. Bitcoin’s price volatility means institutional investors, and public treasuries need clear frameworks to protect taxpayers.”
Ethan Cole, partner at financial advisory firm Horizon Asset Management, noted through a verified source.
The bill itself mandates oversight mechanisms, including annual reporting and independent audits, and calls for the treasurer to evaluate the reserve’s performance and risk profile over time.
These procedural safeguards aim to balance innovation with accountability, should the law take effect on July 1, 2026.
Tennessee’s legislative push comes amid a broader national conversation about Bitcoin and digital asset strategy. At the federal level, proposals like the Boosting Innovation, Technology, and Competitiveness through Optimised Investment Nationwide (BITCOIN) Act.
This was introduced in the U.S. Senate; it seeks to establish a national Bitcoin reserve, reflecting rising political interest in crypto’s role in strategic financial policy.
Some states have moved ahead: New Hampshire became the first to authorise investment in cryptocurrencies by its treasury, while similar bills in Arizona and Montana have met resistance or outright rejection.
These varied outcomes illustrate the complex calculus states face when balancing innovation with fiduciary responsibility.
Tennessee’s bill and comparable measures signal potential institutional demand growth and greater integration of digital assets into public sector portfolios, a development that could influence market sentiment and long-term adoption trajectories.
