- Trending
- Comments
- Latest
Australia’s bitcoin industry has filed a formal complaint against the country’s public broadcaster, accusing the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) of publishing “factually inaccurate and misleading” coverage that frames Bitcoin primarily as a money laundering tool.
The Australian Bitcoin Industry Body (ABIB) alleges ABC violated its editorial standards by omitting legitimate Bitcoin use cases—including energy grid stabilization, humanitarian payments, and remittances—while disproportionately linking the technology to criminal activity.
The complaint comes as Australia’s crypto adoption rate surges to 31%, surpassing the United States, and as regulators roll out the country’s first comprehensive digital asset framework.
The second paragraph begins with ABIB lawsuit, emphasizing its central role in a national debate over media accuracy. The complaint arrives at a time when Australian crypto adoption is booming.
According to a16z’s State of Crypto 2025 report, the country’s adoption rate soared to 31% in 2025, surpassing even the United States and positioning Australia as one of the most crypto-engaged populations globally.
ABIB says its office receives a constant stream of messages from members frustrated by recurring misrepresentation of Bitcoin within Australian media, particularly from publicly funded outlets obligated to uphold journalistic accuracy.
ABIB spokesperson Liam O’Shaughnessy said in the filing, The ABIB lawsuit isn’t about criticism—it’s about accountability.
Bitcoin’s role in Australia is growing, and the public deserves reporting grounded in verified facts, not outdated narratives.
At the center of the ABIB lawsuit is a detailed breakdown of ABC statements that ABIB claims violated the network’s editorial policies and code of conduct.
The complaint asserts that ABC engaged in one-sided framing by disproportionately associating Bitcoin with criminal activity while failing to acknowledge publicly available information demonstrating legitimate Bitcoin applications across Australia’s financial and industrial sectors.
Media ethics researcher Dr. Simone Redding of the University of Sydney commented, “If the ABIB lawsuit proves that ABC selectively omitted material context, it could pressure public broadcasters to reassess how they cover emerging technologies.”
The ABIB lawsuit also unfolds against the backdrop of sweeping regulatory transformation. In November, Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino introduced the Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025, the country’s first end-to-end regulatory framework for crypto custodians and digital asset platforms.
Chalmers noted, We take Australia’s crypto industry seriously. Blockchain and digital assets represent big opportunities for our economy, our financial system, and our businesses.
The bill is projected to unlock $24 billion in annual productivity gains, strengthening both innovation and consumer protection.
Under the reforms, crypto exchanges and custody providers must secure an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL), placing them under direct ASIC oversight.
Recent moves from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) underline the regulatory shift occurring in parallel with the ABIB lawsuit.
In October, ASIC classified stablecoins, tokenized securities, wrapped tokens, and digital asset wallets as financial products—requiring licensing and compliance with transition deadlines running through June 30, 2026.
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland stated, “Distributed ledger technology and tokenization are reshaping global finance. Our guidance gives firms clarity to innovate safely and confidently.”
ASIC Chair Joe Longo added a stark warning:
“Australia risks becoming a land of missed opportunity unless it adapts to blockchain-driven tokenization. J.P. Morgan told us their money-market funds will be 100% tokenized within two years.”
As the ABIB lawsuit gains momentum, industry observers say the outcome could reshape public discourse on digital assets and set a precedent for how deeply traditional media is held accountable in a fast-digitizing world.
