US Court of Appeal Revisits HEX Manipulation Case Against Binance.US, Others

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has partially reversed the dismissal of a class-action lawsuit alleging that Binance.US and CoinMarketCap engaged in unlawful manipulation of the HEX token price. This HEX manipulation case decision reopens the door for plaintiff Ryan Cox to pursue claims that the companies artificially deflated the price of the HEX token while promoting their own digital assets.

Legal Proceedings Take a Turn

The lawsuit, which was originally filed in 2021, was dismissed by a district court in February 2023. The lower court’s ruling centered on the plaintiff’s failure to establish sufficient connections between Binance.US’s activities and the state of Arizona, where the case was initially filed. However, the Ninth Circuit panel disagreed, ruling that the district court erred in its judgment regarding the jurisdictional issues.

“Given that each company is incorporated or has a principal place of business in the United States, each has sufficient contacts with the United States to satisfy due process,” the appellate judges wrote in their opinion.

This reversal means that the HEX manipulation case will proceed, with the U.S.-based defendants now facing renewed scrutiny under the allegations. The appeals court found that Cox’s claims of price manipulation against Binance.US were justifiable, and the case has been remanded for ongoing legal proceedings.

Allegations of Price Manipulation

The core of the HEX manipulation case revolves around accusations that Binance Capital Management and Binance.US, through their ownership of CoinMarketCap, deliberately manipulated HEX’s ranking on the popular cryptocurrency price-tracking platform. Cox alleges that this artificial suppression led to HEX trading at a significantly lower price than it would have in a fair market environment. Furthermore, the suit suggests that Binance’s own tokens were preferentially ranked higher, potentially leading to unfair market advantages.

Cox’s original filing states that these actions were not just financially damaging to HEX investors but also undermined the credibility and integrity of the cryptocurrency market as a whole. The plaintiff’s attorney, who has remained steadfast in pursuing the case, described the Ninth Circuit’s decision as a “significant victory for transparency and fairness in the digital asset space.”

Wider Implications of the Case

This legal battle has broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry, particularly concerning the transparency and fairness of platforms like CoinMarketCap that are often seen as the arbiters of value in the digital currency world. The case underscores the growing scrutiny over exchanges and their influence on token prices, an issue that regulators and market participants are increasingly concerned about.

Speaking on the potential impact of the case, financial regulation expert Professor John H. Coffee Jr. of Columbia Law School commented, “If these allegations hold, it could signal a seismic shift in how digital assets are monitored and how exchanges are held accountable for their actions. This HEX manipulation case could set a precedent for how we approach market fairness in an industry that has largely operated in the shadows.”

The HEX Token’s Tumultuous Journey

Launched in December 2019 by Richard Heart, the HEX token promised high returns and a novel staking mechanism. However, the token has faced significant controversy and regulatory challenges. Its price peaked at $0.51 in September 2021 but has since plummeted by over 99%, now trading at just $0.004. The decline in HEX’s value has been compounded by legal challenges, including a high-profile lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Heart himself.

In July 2023, the SEC sued Heart for allegedly defrauding investors out of at least $12.1 million. The agency claimed that Heart diverted investor funds meant for developing and marketing HEX into luxury purchases, including a 555-carat diamond, high-end watches, and luxury automobiles. The SEC’s case against Heart further clouds the future of HEX, already reeling from its steep price decline and the allegations of manipulation at the hands of Binance.US and CoinMarketCap.

HEX Manipulation Case: What Lies Ahead?

As the HEX manipulation case returns to the courts, the crypto community and legal observers alike are watching closely. The outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences, not just for Binance.US and CoinMarketCap, but for the entire cryptocurrency industry. The ongoing legal battles underscore the need for greater transparency and regulation in a market that has often been compared to the “Wild West” due to its lack of oversight.

For now, the case serves as a reminder of the potential risks and pitfalls of the rapidly evolving digital asset space. As the legal process unfolds, the question remains: will the HEX manipulation case bring about meaningful changes, or will it be just another chapter in the tumultuous history of cryptocurrency?

The Ninth Circuit’s decision to partially reverse the dismissal of the HEX manipulation case represents a critical moment for the plaintiff and a significant warning shot for the cryptocurrency industry. As Binance.US and CoinMarketCap prepare for what promises to be a contentious legal battle, the implications of this case will likely resonate across the entire digital asset ecosystem, challenging the practices of exchanges and platforms that play a central role in shaping the market.

Get more from The Bit Gazette