The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has abruptly withdrawn more than a dozen Biden-era proposed crypto rules. These rules include two major regulations aimed at tightening oversight of decentralized finance (DeFi) and crypto custody.
The move indicates a dramatic pivot in the SEC’s approach to digital assets and could reshape the regulatory landscape for exchanges, investment advisers, and blockchain startups.
The SEC confirmed on Thursday it was rescinding multiple pending regulations introduced under former Chair Gary Gensler, effectively nullifying years of proposed crypto policies.
Among the axed proposals were Rule 3b-16—a controversial expansion of the “exchange” definition threatening DeFi platforms—and stricter custody requirements that would have forced investment firms to hold crypto with SEC-approved “qualified custodians.”
The Biden-era proposed crypto rules had drawn fierce backlash from the industry for potentially stifling innovation. With their repeal, the SEC signals a retreat from its aggressive stance under Gensler, though the agency left open the possibility of future rulemaking.
The now-defunct Rule 3b-16 sought to classify DeFi protocols as securities exchanges by broadening regulatory language to include “communication protocols” matching buyers and sellers. Critics warned this could have forced decentralized platforms like Uniswap to register as exchanges or face penalties.
Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, celebrated the reversal on X (formerly Twitter), posting:
“Down goes 3b-16, qualified custodian, and all the other unfinished Gensler rule proposals.”
The Biden-era proposed crypto rules had been a focal point of legal battles, with the SEC accused of overreach.
Another repealed proposal, the 2023 “Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets” rule, would have mandated advisers to store crypto exclusively with banks or broker-dealers meeting rigid custodial standards. Most crypto-native firms lacked “qualified custodian” status, risking mass client withdrawals.
The Biden-era proposed crypto rules on custody faced pushback for ignoring the unique technical challenges of securing digital assets. Their withdrawal grants temporary relief to firms like Grayscale and Fidelity, though the SEC may revisit the issue under new leadership.
Beyond crypto, the SEC scrapped rules targeting:
Cybersecurity disclosures for funds and advisers (impacting crypto custodians).
Position reporting for large security-based swaps (affecting crypto derivatives traders).
ESG compliance for public companies (a Biden administration priority).
The sweeping rollback aligns with President Trump’s deregulation agenda, though the SEC emphasized it retains authority to propose updated rules.
Crypto advocates hailed the reversal of Biden-era proposed crypto rules as a step toward regulatory certainty.
“The SEC’s approach was untenable for decentralized technologies,” said Sheila Warren, CEO of the Crypto Council for Innovation. “This creates breathing room for constructive dialogue.”
However, skeptics warn the vacuum could invite risk. “Investor protections shouldn’t be collateral damage in political fights,” argued Dennis Kelleher of Better Markets.
With the Biden-era proposed crypto rules shelved, attention turns to Congress, where bipartisan efforts like the FIT21 Act aim to define the SEC and CFTC’s roles in crypto oversight. Meanwhile, the SEC’s enforcement division remains active, pursuing high-profile cases against Coinbase and Binance.
Olivia Jackson is a US-based cryptocurrency writer and market analyst with a passion for decoding the complexities of blockchain technology and digital assets. With over five years of experience covering the crypto space, she specializes in breaking down market trends, regulatory developments, and emerging Web3 innovations for both retail and institutional audiences. Her work has appeared in leading finance and tech publications, including CoinDesk, Decrypt, and The Block, where she provides data-driven insights on Bitcoin, DeFi, and the evolving regulatory landscape. Olivia is particularly interested in the intersection of traditional finance and decentralized systems, often exploring how macroeconomic shifts impact crypto markets.