Tag: crypto funding

  • Sculptor refuses to release 18-foot Trump statue until crypto backers pay $91,200 balance

    Sculptor refuses to release 18-foot Trump statue until crypto backers pay $91,200 balance

    An 18-foot bronze statue of Donald Trump coated in gold leaf—commissioned by cryptocurrency entrepreneurs for $300,000 to promote their $PATRIOT memecoin—remains stuck in an Ohio foundry after sculptor Alan Cottrill refused to release the work until backers pay the outstanding $91,200 balance, a payment dispute that has left the monument, dubbed “Don Colossus,” in storage for months while the token it was meant to promote has crashed more than 90% from its peak.

    Payment dispute halts installation

    Ohio-based sculptor Alan Cottrill, who created the bronze statue before it was coated in gold leaf, says he is still owed a significant balance and will not release the work until payment is completed.

    “What they owe me is $91,200… They know it’s not leaving until they pay me.” — Alan Cottrill, Sculptor

    Cottrill has also argued that images of his design were used to promote the associated cryptocurrency without full authorisation, adding intellectual-property concerns to the financial dispute.

    Backers of the project, however, maintain that payments have been made according to agreed terms and that remaining funds are typically withheld until completion and delivery.

    “The deal was we would pay whatever the final outstanding bill was before the statue leaves for its final destination.” — Dustin Stockton, Project Patron

    Due to the dispute, the statue, which was initially intended to be installed and unveiled in public, has remained in the artist’s possession while talks are ongoing.

    A memecoin marketing strategy that lost momentum

    The statue’s creation was closely tied to the promotion of a speculative cryptocurrency known as $PATRIOT, which was launched by the same group of crypto investors who financed the sculpture.

    To inspire supporters and draw attention to the token, the investors reportedly spent about $300,000 commissioning the monument, which featured an image of Trump pumping his fist after escaping an assassination attempt in 2024.

    Memecoins typically rely on viral marketing and celebrity association, and the statue became a centrepiece of that promotional effort through social media campaigns and planned public appearances.

    Initial interest in the token was short-lived. After a brief surge following its late-2024 launch, $PATRIOT lost more than 90% of its value, weighed down by internal disputes and competition from other Trump-related digital assets.

    Analysts note that the token’s decline reflects the broader volatility common in memecoin markets, where price movements are often driven more by sentiment and publicity than by underlying utility.

    Political symbolism meets crypto risk

    Project organisers have persisted in their plans for a public unveiling at Trump’s Doral resort, where a pedestal has already been prepared, despite the token’s decline.

    The Trump family has publicly distanced itself from the $PATRIOT coin, stating it had no involvement in the cryptocurrency’s creation.

    Meanwhile, the unresolved payment dispute continues to prevent installation, leaving the statue, intended as both tribute and marketing spectacle, caught between business negotiations and declining investor enthusiasm.

    The episode illustrates how crypto-driven promotional strategies can entail reputational and operational risks when funding, intellectual property rights, or project governance are unclear.

  • Stablecoin issuer Tether retreats from massive fundraising round, casting doubt on IPO timeline

    Stablecoin issuer Tether retreats from massive fundraising round, casting doubt on IPO timeline

    Tether has significantly scaled back capital-raising ambitions that would have valued the stablecoin issuer at up to $500 billion, according to a Financial Times report, as investors pushed back on the lofty price tag amid regulatory uncertainty and transparency concerns.

    The company behind USDT, the world’s largest stablecoin with $185 billion in circulation, had explored raising $15 billion to $20 billion but is now considering a smaller $5 billion round—or no fundraising at all—casting fresh doubt on long-rumored plans for a public listing.

    Investor Pushback Cools $500 Billion Valuation Talk

    According to a report by the Financial Times, Tether had initially explored raising between $15 billion and $20 billion at a valuation that would have placed it among the most valuable private companies in the world. That valuation would have rivaled global heavyweights such as SpaceX, OpenAI, and ByteDance.

    However, sources familiar with the talks said investor enthusiasm quickly cooled. Backers reportedly balked at the lofty valuation, citing regulatory uncertainty, lingering transparency concerns around reserves, and historical allegations related to illicit use of USDT.

    This investor resistance forced a rethink of Tether ipo fundraising, with discussions now centered around a much smaller $5 billion raise—or none at all. The shift reflects a broader recalibration across crypto markets, where investors are increasingly unwilling to underwrite sky-high valuations without clearer regulatory and governance frameworks.

    Speculation Fueled by Crypto Insiders

    Interest in a possible public listing gained traction in September 2025 when BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes reignited speculation, suggesting that a Tether IPO could dwarf Circle’s earlier public debut.

    Tether ipo fundraising

    At the time, Hayes argued that Tether’s scale—anchored by more than $185 billion in circulating USDT—and its highly profitable business model gave it a structural advantage over rivals. His comments amplified chatter around Tether ipo fundraising, pushing expectations toward a blockbuster listing.

    Yet market reality has proven less forgiving. While Tether dominates stablecoin issuance, investors appear less willing to price the firm like a tech unicorn amid heightened regulatory oversight of stablecoins globally.

    Profitability Reduces Need for External Capital

    Despite the fundraising pullback, Tether’s financial position remains strong. The company reported approximately $10 billion in profits for 2025, down around 23% year-on-year due to Bitcoin price weakness, but partially offset by gains on gold holdings and interest income from U.S. Treasurys.

    That profitability reduces the operational necessity of Tether ipo fundraising, reinforcing management’s long-held position that the firm does not need outside capital to function.

    Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s CEO, pushed back against claims that the company was actively seeking a massive raise.

    “That number is not our goal. It’s our maximum,” Ardoino said, according to the report. “If we were selling zero, we would be very happy as well.”

    Tether ipo fundraising

    The statement highlights that any fundraising effort is more strategic than financial—aimed at partnerships or credibility rather than survival.

    Ratings Downgrade Adds Caution

    Still, caution around Tether ipo fundraising has been reinforced by a recent assessment from S&P Global Ratings, which flagged growing exposure to higher-risk assets within Tether’s reserves.

    According to Reuters, S&P noted increased allocations to Bitcoin, gold, corporate bonds, secured loans, and other investments that carry market and credit risk, while also pointing to limited disclosures around custodians and counterparties.

    “Tether continues to provide limited information on the creditworthiness of its custodians, counterparties, or bank account providers,” S&P said, highlighting factors that could concern public-market investors.

    The assessment does not threaten Tether’s dominance but adds another layer of scrutiny at a time when stablecoin issuers are under intensifying regulatory pressure worldwide.

    What the Pullback Means for an IPO

    The retreat from aggressive Tether ipo fundraising timelines has inevitably reshaped expectations around a public listing. While an IPO no longer appears imminent, it has not been ruled out.

    Recent developments could still pave the way. U.S. stablecoin legislation under President Donald Trump, along with Tether’s rollout of a U.S.-compliant stablecoin product, may help the firm address regulatory hurdles that previously made a listing unlikely.

    If market conditions improve and transparency standards evolve, analysts say a 2026 IPO remains possible—though likely at a valuation far below earlier speculation.

    A Broader Signal to the Crypto Market

    Beyond Tether itself, the fundraising retreat sends a broader signal to the crypto industry. Even the most profitable and systemically important firms are no longer immune to valuation discipline.Tether ipo fundraisingAs the issuer of crypto’s de facto reserve currency, Tether’s approach to Tether ipo fundraising reflects a growing emphasis on sustainability, disclosure, and profitability over hype-driven narratives.

    For other crypto firms eyeing public markets, the message is clear: strong fundamentals matter more than headline valuations.

    IPO Optional, Not Urgent

    Ardoino has previously stated that Tether does not need to go public—and the latest developments reinforce that stance. Still, he has stopped short of closing the door entirely.

    For now, Tether ipo fundraising appears to be an option rather than a necessity. Whether it ultimately leads to a public listing will depend less on speculation and more on regulatory clarity, market stability, and investor trust.

  • Berachain says refund rights for $25 million investor were compliance requirement, not special privilege

    Berachain says refund rights for $25 million investor were compliance requirement, not special privilege

    Berachain has disputed a report characterizing a side agreement that gave Brevan Howard’s Nova Digital the right to reclaim its $25 million Series B investment within one year of the blockchain’s token launch.

    The arrangement, disclosed in documents published by Unchained, has sparked debate about preferential treatment and transparency after Berachain founder Smokey The Bera said the refund clause was a compliance requirement for Nova’s liquid fund structure, not a special privilege unavailable to other investors.

    Dispute Over How the Berachain Refund Deal Was Presented

    The controversy began when Unchained reported that Berachain granted Nova Digital, Brevan Howard’s crypto-focused fund, a one-year right to reclaim its full $25 million Series B investment—a right triggered after Berachain completed its token generation event (TGE) on Feb. 6, 2024. According to the report, the Berachain refund deal gave Nova a window extending to Feb. 6, 2026.

    A side letter published by Unchained included signatures from Berachain general counsel Jonathan Ip and Nova director Carol Reynolds, outlining that Nova could retrieve “some or all” of its investment for “twelve months following” the TGE. The Berachain refund deal quickly became a focal point of debate due to its potentially precedent-setting implications for blockchain fundraising.

    However, Berachain founder Smokey The Bera challenged the framework presented in the coverage. The founder insisted that the reporting surrounding the Berachain refund deal misrepresented how the investment terms were structured.

    “The report was inaccurate and incomplete and Brevan’s investments involve several complex commercial agreements, but they participated in the Series B fundraise on the same paperwork as all investors,” — Smokey The Bera, founder of Berachain.
    Source: Smokey The Bera

    Smokey added that Brevan Howard co-led the round “on the same terms as all other investors,” rejecting suggestions that the Berachain refund deal offered Nova preferential access that other early-stage supporters did not receive.

    Why Nova Requested Additional Protections

    According to Smokey, Nova requested extra provisions because its fund structure required liquidity and regulatory clarity following Berachain’s TGE. Before token launch, Nova’s locked BERA tokens would not qualify as an eligible investment under its liquid strategy, prompting the Berachain refund deal to act as a safeguard—not a profit-protection mechanism.

    Smokey said the refund clause was designed “to guard for a scenario in which Berachain failed to TGE and get listed.” This, they argued, integrated the Berachain refund deal into Nova’s compliance obligations rather than offering any special privilege.

    They added that Nova entered “additional commercial arrangements, including an agreement to provide liquidity on the network, which was only possible upon launch.”

    The founder emphasized that these commitments formed part of a broader commercial partnership, noting that Nova is not merely a passive investor but one of the largest tokenholders in the ecosystem. “They have increased their BERA exposure over time, despite running a liquid fund in a harsh alt environment,” — Smokey The Bera.

    This layer of involvement added new context to the Berachain refund deal, illustrating Nova’s ongoing participation in supporting Berachain’s market operations.

    HInvestor Reactions and Market Impact

    The debate over the Berachain refund deal comes amid a challenging period for the project. Berachain’s token, BERA, has fallen 93% from its February peak of $14.83 and is currently trading near $1.05. The timing of the leaked Berachain refund deal raised speculation among traders about whether institutional pressure or structural risk prompted Nova to seek more flexible liquidity rights.

    Berachain has denied that the Berachain refund deal was introduced to mitigate post-launch losses or reassure hesitant investors. Instead, it claims the arrangement has “precedent” in similar liquidity-constrained fund structures.

    Brevan Howard did not respond to requests for comment, and the Berachain Foundation acknowledged receiving inquiries but has not yet issued a formal statement beyond Smokey’s posts on X.

    Meanwhile, transparency advocates argue that the Berachain refund deal reveals a need for clearer industry standards regarding side letters, liquidity protections, and investor disclosures in blockchain fundraising rounds.

    As the crypto market continues to mature, the Berachain refund deal underscores the tension between fund requirements, startup financing practices, and the expectations of community investors who often lack access to the same contractual protections.

  • Amdax raises €30M to launch bitcoin treasury firm with planned Dutch exchange listing

    Amdax raises €30M to launch bitcoin treasury firm with planned Dutch exchange listing

    Dutch cryptocurrency firm Amdax has raised €30 million ($35 million) to launch AMBTS, a new bitcoin treasury venture targeting institutional investors, the company announced Tuesday.

    The Amsterdam-based firm plans to list AMBTS on a Dutch exchange and will use the funding to begin strategic bitcoin purchases, joining a growing number of European companies adding cryptocurrency to their corporate balance sheets.

    “The closing of this round is an important milestone,” said Lucas Wensing, CEO and AMBTS co-founder. “We now move forward with our bitcoin strategy, aiming to offer investors transparent access to this unique asset class.”

    The fundraising effort positions Dutch crypto firm Amdax among a select group of companies betting on Bitcoin’s long-term value as a hedge and strategic reserve asset.

    AMBTS: A new treasury model for bitcoin investment

    With the launch of AMBTS, Dutch crypto firm Amdax is introducing a treasury model that mirrors the approach of prominent firms integrating bitcoin into their corporate reserves. The AMBTS platform will allow institutional investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin through regulated and transparent channels, leveraging the Netherlands’ growing reputation as a hub for digital asset innovation.

    According to the company, the newly raised funds will support the operational rollout of AMBTS, including regulatory compliance and exchange integration. This step comes as bitcoin continues to attract institutional investors despite market volatility and regulatory scrutiny.

    Industry analysts view the move by Dutch crypto firm Amdax as a calculated effort to solidify its presence in Europe’s evolving digital finance ecosystem. The company’s emphasis on regulatory transparency could also appeal to traditional investors seeking secure crypto exposure.

    Institutional players embrace bitcoin treasuries

    Dutch crypto firm Amdax joins an expanding list of institutions establishing bitcoin treasuries. Among its peers are Treasury, a Dutch-based firm backed by U.S. billionaires Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, and Strive, supported by former U.S. presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy. Additionally, Michael Saylor’s company, Strategy, continues to be a key example of aggressive corporate bitcoin accumulation.

    This collective trend among corporate entities highlights the shifting perception of bitcoin — from speculative asset to legitimate treasury reserve. For Dutch crypto firm Amdax, AMBTS represents both an innovation in corporate finance and a statement of confidence in the long-term potential of decentralized assets.

    As CEO Lucas Wensing noted, “We now move forward with our bitcoin strategy,” underscoring the company’s commitment to aligning with the new wave of institutional bitcoin adoption.

    A milestone for the European crypto market

    The successful €30 million funding round signals that investor confidence in bitcoin-related ventures remains strong, even amid fluctuating global markets. For Dutch crypto firm Amdax, this achievement not only provides operational capital but also validates its strategy of bridging traditional finance and the crypto economy.

    With AMBTS poised to launch, Amdax’s model could influence how European institutions manage their digital reserves in the future. As more firms explore bitcoin as part of their financial infrastructure, Dutch crypto firm Amdax may find itself at the forefront of Europe’s next wave of crypto treasury innovation.

     

  • Ripple backs Gemini with $150M credit line as landmark IPO nears

    Ripple backs Gemini with $150M credit line as landmark IPO nears

    Gemini Ripple loan activity has taken center stage ahead of the exchange’s IPO, with Gemini disclosing a credit facility of up to $150 million backed by Ripple. According to its August 15 S-1 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the deal begins with a $75 million Ripple credit line and can be expanded in $5 million increments, giving the crypto exchange fresh financial firepower as it prepares for its public debut.

    The agreement permits Gemini to borrow more in RLUSD once the initial limit is reached, provided Ripple consents to the request. This Gemini Ripple credit line must be collateralized and carries an annual interest rate between 6.5% and 8.5%.

    Gemini Ripple Loan Provides Flexibility for IPO Launch

    Positioning for a Nasdaq debut under the ticker GEMI, Gemini views the Ripple loan as a strategic buffer to support its IPO plans. Notably, the exchange had not drawn on the Gemini Ripple credit line as of the August 2025 filing date. The secured funding from the Gemini Ripple credit line is designed to cushion Gemini against market volatility and provide liquidity flexibility as it enters the public market.

    Gemini’s team clarified that the Gemini Ripple credit line is not a direct equity purchase by Ripple nor is it intended as financing for the IPO itself. The Ripple loan provides Gemini with a financial cushion as it moves toward becoming a public company.

    Financial Performance and IPO Funding Goals

    Recent reports indicate that Gemini is seeking to raise up to $400 million for its IPO with the Gemini Ripple credit line supplementing its financial strategy. The company plans to use some of the IPO proceeds for growth initiatives and the remainder to address existing debts.

    According to the SEC filing, Gemini is aiming for a $100 million raise via its Class A common stock IPO. As of June 30, 2025, the company held $589.2 million in cash bolstered by the additional liquidity provided through the Ripple loan.

    Despite the Gemini Ripple loan, the company reported a net loss of $282.5 million for the first half of 2025 on revenue of $67.9 million. Transaction fees made up over 65% of this revenue. In the same period last year, Gemini posted a $41.4 million loss on $73.5 million in revenue. The company also claims to manage over $18 billion in assets.

    Gemini Ripple Loan Supports Growth Amid Market Challenges

    The Gemini Ripple loan is part of a broader strategy to navigate the volatile crypto market. The company’s management believes that potential legal exposures will not materially impact its financial health or operations. However, Gemini acknowledged that fluctuations in crypto valuations and crypto loans including the Gemini Ripple loan have significantly affected its financial results.

    Gemini has also announced that it will not pay dividends in the near future choosing instead to reinvest all earnings to fuel growth. The company’s capital expenditures have continued to rise even as operational cash flow remains negative. The Gemini Ripple loan provides additional flexibility to support these investments.

    Strategic Focus Moving Forward

    Looking ahead, Gemini’s growth strategy centers on increasing monthly active users, boosting trading volume, expanding globally, growing its asset base, and pursuing mergers and acquisitions. The Gemini Ripple loan is expected to play a key role in supporting these objectives ensuring the company has the resources needed to compete and thrive in the evolving crypto landscape.

    In summary, the Gemini Ripple loan stands as a crucial element in Gemini’s financial planning offering both security and flexibility as the company prepares for its public debut and future expansion.

  • UK Regulator, CFA, Set to Ban Borrowing for Crypto Investments – May 2 Report

    UK Regulator, CFA, Set to Ban Borrowing for Crypto Investments – May 2 Report

    The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is implementing stricter measures to reduce high-risk crypto investments by prohibiting retail investors from purchasing digital assets using borrowed funds. This ban will extend to credit cards, personal loans, and other forms of leveraged financing, a decisive move designed to shield consumers from accumulating unsustainable debt during periods of extreme market volatility.

    The FCA’s intervention comes amid growing concerns that inexperienced investors could face severe financial losses if cryptocurrency values plummet while they remain obligated to repay borrowed capital. By restricting credit-based crypto purchases, the regulator aims to foster more responsible investment practices while still allowing individuals to participate in digital asset markets using their disposable income.

    Why the FCA is Targeting Crypto Investments

    In a recent discussion paper, the FCA outlined its concerns over retail investors taking on excessive risk when funding crypto investments with loans or credit. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, emphasized that while crypto presents growth opportunities, it must be approached cautiously.

    “Crypto is an area of potential growth for the UK, but it has to be done right,” Geale told the Financial Times. “To do that, we have to provide an appropriate level of protection.”

    The regulator clarified that it is not hostile toward the crypto industry but views crypto investments as inherently high-risk with limited consumer safeguards.

    Upcoming Rules for Crypto Platforms

    The FCA’s proposed regulations will cover trading platforms, intermediaries, and lending services. Key measures include:

    • Banning credit-funded crypto purchases – Preventing consumers from using loans or credit cards to buy digital assets.

    • Stricter rules for retail investors – Imposing higher protections compared to professional investors.

    • Transparency requirements – Ensuring fair pricing and execution of trades.

    • Restrictions on order flow payments – Prohibiting platforms from incentivizing intermediaries for directing trades.

    Geale stated that the FCA’s goal is to create a regulatory framework that balances safety with competitiveness:

    “If we can get the regulatory regime right, it actually becomes attractive for firms. That is what we are trying to achieve.”

    crypto investments in the UK
    FCA crypto regulation discussion paper. Credit: FCA

    Rising Concerns Over Debt-Fueled Crypto Investments

    The FCA’s crackdown follows a worrying trend—more consumers are using credit to fund crypto investments. According to FCA research:

    • In 2022, only 6% of crypto purchases were made using credit.

    • By 2024, that figure rose to 14%.

    The regulator fears that if crypto prices crash, investors relying on borrowed funds could face severe financial strain.

    Additional Safeguards Against Market Risks

    Beyond restricting credit-based crypto investments, the FCA plans to address other risks, including:

    • Market manipulation – Preventing unfair trading practices.

    • Liquidity issues – Ensuring platforms can handle large withdrawals.

    • Staking risks – Requiring compensation for losses caused by third-party failures.

    Decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms may be exempt if they operate without a central controlling entity.

    A Safer Path for Crypto Investments

    The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) proposed regulations mark a significant turning point for crypto investments in the UK, prioritizing long-term market stability over short-term speculation. These rules represent one of the most comprehensive regulatory frameworks for digital assets to date, positioning Britain as a leader in responsible crypto innovation. While some traders may view the restrictions as limiting, the measures are designed to cultivate a more transparent and secure environment for crypto investments, one that protects consumers while still allowing the market to flourish.

    For both new and experienced investors, the FCA’s guidance establishes an important principle: crypto investments should align with personal financial security, funded only through disposable income rather than risky leverage. This approach mirrors traditional investment best practices, applying them to the volatile world of digital assets. As the regulatory landscape continues to mature, the UK is poised to become a global model, demonstrating how robust oversight can coexist with cutting-edge financial technology. Stay tuned to The Bit Gazette for the latest update.

  • Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge

    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge

    Crypto startup funding surged to $2.7 billion in the second quarter of 2024 despite a decline in the total number of deals. This figure, representing a slight increase from Q1, highlights venture capitalists’ growing confidence in the potential of blockchain technology and its applications.

    According to a report from Pitchbook, released on 9th August, crypto startup funding experienced a 2.5% rise in total invested capital, even as the number of deals dropped by 12.5% compared to the previous quarter. This divergence between the volume of funding and the number of deals suggests that while fewer projects are securing investment, those that do are attracting significant capital. The data from Pitchbook underscores a maturing venture capital landscape, where investors are becoming more selective, focusing on high-potential projects within the crypto space.

    Infrastructure Projects at the Forefront of Crypto Startup Funding

    The second quarter of 2024 was particularly notable for the dominance of crypto infrastructure projects in attracting venture capital. These projects, which are essential to the blockchain ecosystem, secured a combined $685 million in new capital, driving a substantial portion of crypto startup funding. This trend reflects a broader shift in investor priorities towards strengthening the infrastructure necessary to support the continued adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge
    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge. Credit: Pitchbook

    Monad, a layer-1 platform, emerged as a significant player in Q2, raising $225 million in a Series A funding round. This success story within crypto startup funding illustrates the ongoing interest in scalable blockchain solutions capable of handling increasing demands from a global user base. Another noteworthy project, the DeFi protocol BeraChain, secured $100 million in a Series B round. BeraChain’s innovative proof-of-liquidity model is attracting attention for its potential to transform decentralised finance (DeFi) by offering a more secure and efficient alternative to existing protocols.

    Meanwhile, Bitcoin restaking platform Babylon raised $70 million in an early-stage round. Babylon’s focus on enhancing the security and functionality of the Bitcoin network has resonated strongly with investors. The emphasis on infrastructure within crypto startup funding signals the sector’s maturity and indicates that the crypto economy’s foundational elements are still being actively developed and refined.

    Mega-Rounds Signal Investor Confidence

    In addition to the robust performance of infrastructure projects, Q2 also witnessed two significant “mega-rounds” that underscored strong investor confidence in the crypto sector. Farcaster, a decentralised social media protocol, raised an impressive $150 million in a Series A round, achieving a post-money valuation of $1 billion. Farcaster’s success within crypto startup funding highlights the growing intersection between social media and blockchain, particularly in creating platforms that prioritise user autonomy and data ownership. 

    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge
    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge. Credit: DeFiLamma

    Similarly, blockchain gaming platform Zentry secured $140 million in an early-stage round. Zentry’s success is a testament to the enduring interest in the gaming sector, particularly as blockchain technology introduces new ways to enhance player experiences and create value through digital ownership and play-to-earn models.

    These mega-rounds reflect the broader trend within crypto startup funding, where larger amounts of capital are being concentrated on fewer projects, even as the overall number of deals declines. This approach suggests that investors are becoming more strategic, focusing their resources on projects with the potential for significant scale and impact.

    A Broader Context of Slowing Investment

    Despite the positive signs in Q2, it’s crucial to note that crypto startup funding has slowed considerably from the highs of 2021 and 2022. In those years, the industry witnessed an unprecedented $25.3 billion and $29.4 billion in new capital, respectively. The $2.7 billion raised in Q2 2024, while substantial, is modest in comparison to the explosive growth seen during the peak of the crypto bull market.

    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge
    Crypto Startup Funding Grows to $2.7B in Q2 as Infrastructure Projects Lead the Charge

    Pitchbook’s data reveals that total investment in crypto firms for 2023 reached $10.1 billion. At the current rate, 2024 is on track to slightly surpass this figure, with an estimated $10.8 billion. This slowdown in crypto startup funding reflects broader market conditions and a more cautious approach from investors, who are now prioritising sustainable, long-term growth over the speculative excesses of previous years.

    The Road Ahead for Crypto Startup Funding

    Looking ahead, the crypto startup funding landscape is expected to remain highly competitive, particularly at earlier fundraising stages. As the number of new projects entering the market continues to grow, securing early-stage funding has become increasingly challenging. Investors are now demanding more robust business models and clearer paths to profitability before committing capital.

    However, the success of infrastructure projects and the emergence of mega-rounds indicate that significant capital is still available for the right projects. Pitchbook’s report suggests that as long as investor sentiment remains positive and broader market conditions stabilise, the volume and pace of crypto startup funding are likely to continue increasing throughout the year.

    As the crypto industry continues to evolve, the emphasis on infrastructure and strategic mega-rounds within crypto startup funding suggests that while the pace of growth may have slowed, the sector is far from stagnant. With $2.7 billion raised in Q2, the market is clearly maturing, setting the stage for its next phase of development. The Bit Gazette has the latest crypto news and expert analysis.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?