FTX Bankruptcy Estate Faces SEC Scrutiny Over Crypto Distribution Plan

The unfolding drama surrounding the FTX bankruptcy estate has taken a new turn as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) raises concerns over the proposed plan to repay creditors. According to a recent court filing, the SEC may challenge the distribution of crypto assets, particularly stablecoins, to creditors, potentially delaying or even derailing the bankruptcy plan that promised to return 118% of creditors’ claims.

The FTX Bankruptcy Estate’s Proposed Plan

Earlier this year, the FTX bankruptcy estate submitted a detailed plan designed to expedite the repayment process for creditors. The plan, which garnered significant attention, proposed that 98% of creditors would receive 118% of their claims in cash within 60 days of court approval. This ambitious proposal aimed to restore confidence among FTX’s creditors, who have been left in financial limbo since the collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange.

However, the definition of “cash” within the plan has now become a focal point of contention. The FTX bankruptcy estate’s filing on August 2 defined cash as “the legal tender of the United States of America or the equivalents thereof, including U.S. Dollar pegged stablecoins, bank deposits, checks, and other similar items.” This inclusion of stablecoins—cryptocurrencies that are pegged to the value of a fiat currency like the U.S. dollar—has sparked a reaction from the SEC, which is questioning the legality of such distributions under federal securities laws.

SEC’s Concerns and Potential Challenges

In a filing on Friday, the SEC made it clear that it is not taking a definitive stance on the legality of the transactions outlined in the FTX bankruptcy estate’s plan. However, the regulatory body has reserved the right to challenge any distributions involving crypto assets, particularly stablecoins. “The SEC is not opining as to the legality, under the federal securities laws, of the transactions outlined in the Plan and reserves its rights to challenge transactions involving crypto assets,” the SEC stated in its filing.

The SEC’s concerns extend beyond the definition of cash. The agency has also pointed out that the FTX bankruptcy estate has yet to identify the distribution agent responsible for potentially distributing stablecoins to creditors. This lack of clarity, according to the SEC, raises additional legal and procedural questions that could complicate the plan’s approval.

Industry Reaction to SEC’s Intervention

The SEC’s intervention has drawn sharp criticism from within the cryptocurrency industry, with some accusing the agency of overreach. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, took to X (formerly Twitter) to express his frustration, stating, “This is the height of jurisdictional overreach. The SEC doesn’t even make a case here. They are just unwilling to let it go. It’s a bludgeon they must keep sharp, lest any legitimate actors deign to wield these (boringly above-board) instruments.”

Thorn’s comments reflect a broader sentiment within the industry that the SEC is overly aggressive in its regulation of cryptocurrency-related matters. This latest challenge to the FTX bankruptcy estate’s plan is seen by some as another example of the SEC’s attempts to assert its authority over a rapidly evolving and often misunderstood market.

The Implications for Creditors

For creditors of the FTX bankruptcy estate, the SEC’s objections could have significant implications. The proposed plan, which promised a swift and generous repayment, now faces potential delays as the legal battle over the distribution of stablecoins unfolds. If the SEC decides to formally object to the plan, the court could be forced to reconsider the proposed repayment structure, leading to further uncertainty for creditors who have already endured a prolonged wait.

Adding to the complexity, the SEC has also aligned with the U.S. Trustee in seeking the removal of a provision in the plan that would discharge the Debtors from certain obligations. The agency has signaled that it reserves the right to object to the confirmation of the plan if these changes are not made, further complicating the path forward for the FTX bankruptcy estate.

What’s Next for FTX?

As the FTX bankruptcy estate navigates these challenges, all eyes will be on the court’s response to the SEC’s concerns. The case highlights the ongoing tension between the cryptocurrency industry and regulators, as the legal framework struggles to keep pace with the rapid evolution of digital assets.

For now, the future of the FTX bankruptcy estate’s plan remains uncertain. Creditors, who have been holding out hope for a resolution, may need to brace themselves for additional delays and legal battles. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how crypto assets are handled in bankruptcy proceedings, with implications that extend far beyond FTX.

The FTX bankruptcy estate’s ambitious plan to repay creditors is now under the microscope, with the SEC raising critical questions about the legality of distributing stablecoins. As the court considers these objections, the outcome could have far-reaching consequences for both FTX’s creditors and the broader cryptocurrency industry. With the SEC’s intervention adding a new layer of complexity, the road to resolution for the FTX bankruptcy estate is anything but straightforward.

Get more from The Bit Gazette