Privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation: Can crypto stay anonymous and remain legal?

What started as freedom tech—the crypto’s invisible sect—now faces mounting pressure in the privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation battle. Why? Because regulators are lifting the hood and shining a relentless spotlight on it.

So here comes the old question: can you be private and legal at the same time?

In that case, let’s talk privacy, cryptocurrencies vs regulations, and who’s winning this awkward dance.

Privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation: How privacy cryptos work, and why they’re so controversial

Privacy cryptocurrencies, such as Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC), prioritize user anonymity by using advanced cryptographic techniques. In simpler terms, sending money without leaving fingerprints is the big promise of privacy coins.

Monero employs ring signatures, which mix a user’s transaction with others to make it unclear who the sender is. This way, no one knows who paid whom.

Zcash, on the other hand, takes it further, using cryptographic black magic (zk-SNARKs), allowing transactions to be verified without revealing a single crumb of details about them, ensuring complete privacy.

So people value these coins for financial privacy. To them, it’s not just tech but a shield, as they protect themselves from surveillance, hacking, unwanted tracking, nosy platforms, and sometimes, even governments.

In fact, in a world where every dollar whispers your location, privacy cryptocurrencies have become a haven for those who prioritize confidentiality in their financial transactions.

Global regulators are turning up the heat on the privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation 

As cryptocurrencies become more mainstream, governments worldwide are tightening regulations. Key measures like anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) are now standard requirements for exchanges and wallets.

Policies, such as the EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directive, aim to force exchanges to collect more user information and report suspicious activities. And this is a direct hit to Monero, Zcash, and any coin that promises anonymity features.

A significant development to bear in mind is the EU’s decision to ban privacy coins by 2027, under the Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (AMLR), as reported by Cointelegraph.

This ban prohibits crypto service providers from maintaining anonymous accounts or handling privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies, aiming to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, effective July 1, 2027.

In the battle between privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulations, one part has to win. And so far, the pressure’s on the privacy side, with a thick tension as these regulations are pushing them (privacy coins) into a corner.

So as governments and regulators look to curb illicit activities, they demand more transparency. But these coins? Their whole brand is built on the opposite.

This means they would have to face pressures to implement “de-anonymization” measures, potentially weakening their core function and threatening their survival in the face of rising global oversight.

And this stirs the uncomfortable question: can they stay private and still stay legal?

Privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation: Comments on the crypto street

There are mixed views and stances on the issue of privacy cryptocurrencies vs regulation. Some comments paint privacy coins in a good light, while some suggest the opposite.

Manfred Karrer, Developer and Founder of Bitsquare, once said:

“I expect three things. One, regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges will come. Two, the war on cash, gold, and cryptocurrencies will accelerate. And three, privacy-protecting technologies like Monero and Zcash will elevate in importance.” — Manfred Karrer, Founder of Bitsquare

Meanwhile, there’s Décary-Hétu, who called privacy coins “essential” and said they represent a new reality for law enforcement to adapt to.

“I think they’re essential. I think they’re great. I think we should embrace them. There’s no reason why we should leak information about who we send money to. These are very interesting, and law enforcement will always complain that these new technologies are going to prevent them from doing investigations,” he said. “Is law enforcement going to need to adapt to this new reality?

Probably yes. If you have these privacy coins, you’re going to have to work a little bit harder, and you’re going to have to develop new methods to investigate people. But I don’t think they really change the balance of powers between the offenders and law enforcement. There’s nothing to be afraid of.”

On the not-so-bright side: In June 2020, Coinbase founder and CEO Brian Armstrong admitted that he personally wanted to list Monero, but that “behind-the-scenes conversations” with regulators convinced him that it wasn’t a battle worth waging right now.

“We don’t know if this is a hill we want to die on, and we have to make a lot of tough calls like that” — CEO Brian Armstrong

However, Armstrong believes that regulators will become more comfortable with privacy coins over time.

And then there’s Binance, which provided a statement when asked about the exchange’s thoughts on regulatory pressure. The spokesperson said the following:

“Binance believes regulators are right to pay attention to the potential risks of privacy coins; more regulatory clarity on how privacy coins are treated would be a welcome development for the whole crypto industry.

Binance focuses on keeping users safe with measures such as mandatory KYC [know your customer] and has strict AML [anti-money laundering] protections in place. Our security team closely cooperates with law enforcement agencies around the world to support their investigations, which has previously included identifying relevant Monero transactions.”

Conclusion

Privacy coins gave users a mask, but now regulators want it off. As crypto matures, privacy coins like Monero and Zcash face a tough truth, and that truth is, survival may mean softening their secrecy.

So moving forward, the outlook might be to expect the evolution of privacy coins into hybrids that incorporate regulatory-compliant mechanisms.

Thank you for visiting The Bit Gazette today.