MemeCore’s M token crashes 75% in minutes as ZachXBT demands answers from Binance, Bybit, Kraken and Bitget

The native token of MemeCore, M, lost more than 75% of its value within hours on June 25, wiping billions of dollars from its fully diluted valuation and pushing its market capitalization below $1 billion.

The crash occurred across major centralized exchanges without any immediately identifiable catalyst, reviving longstanding allegations from blockchain investigator ZachXBT that the project’s tokenomics may be heavily influenced by insiders.

The selloff began late Wednesday evening U.S. time, with M falling from approximately $2.60 to below $0.85 in minutes before attempting a modest recovery.

Investors were left scrambling for explanations as liquidity rapidly evaporated and exchange order books thinned.

Neither MemeCore nor several exchanges listing the token had publicly provided a detailed explanation at the time of writing.

ZachXBT revives insider control concerns

Soon after the collapse, on-chain investigator ZachXBT resurfaced earlier criticisms regarding MemeCore’s token distribution and valuation metrics.

“The community needs answers from Binance & Bybit about why M was listed for perps and why Kraken & Bitget listed M spot as these highly manipulated tokens continue to give our industry a bad reputation and extract from retail.” ZachXBT, blockchain investigator, in a Telegram statement.

The investigator had previously questioned MemeCore’s multibillion-dollar valuation in April, asking the project to justify its market capitalization and explain claims that insiders controlled more than 90% of the circulating supply.

“Please provide a single data point to support your $6B mkt cap at a top 20 token and why insiders hold >90% of supply,” — ZachXBT, posted on X in April 2026.

Although no conclusive evidence proving manipulation has been publicly released, blockchain analytics firms and market observers have repeatedly highlighted concerns over concentrated wallet ownership and limited organic trading activity.

Analysts note that tokens with high valuations but relatively low circulating supply often become vulnerable to sharp price dislocations.

Small changes in liquidity conditions can trigger cascading liquidations, especially when leveraged traders dominate order flow.

Exchange scrutiny intensifies

The MemeCore collapse has once again shifted attention toward centralized exchanges and their listing procedures.

Major trading venues including Binance, Bybit, Kraken and Bitget have increasingly faced criticism from parts of the crypto community for listing low-float, high-valuation assets that may expose retail investors to outsized volatility.

The incident bears similarities to recent market events involving other digital assets that experienced severe drawdowns amid allegations of market manipulation and insufficient transparency.

Earlier this month, Humanity Protocol’s H token lost more than 80% of its value following questions surrounding a multimillion-dollar exploit, while EDGE suffered a steep correction after its team attributed unusual price movements to external market actors.

Industry participants argue that stronger disclosure requirements regarding token allocations, vesting schedules and insider holdings could improve investor confidence.

Some market observers also point to a broader trend in 2026, where speculative assets with relatively small free floats have experienced heightened volatility despite favorable sentiment toward the wider cryptocurrency market.

A warning for retail traders

For investors, the MemeCore episode underscores the importance of assessing token distribution data, liquidity profiles and exchange support mechanisms before entering highly speculative positions.

While meme-themed ecosystems continue attracting capital, recent events suggest that elevated valuations alone do not guarantee market resilience.

The absence of an official explanation from MemeCore has left traders relying largely on on-chain analysts and independent investigators for insights into what triggered the collapse.

Whether regulators, exchanges or project teams ultimately respond with greater transparency may determine how similar incidents are perceived in the future.

For now, the sudden implosion of M serves as another reminder that in digital asset markets, rapid price appreciation built on limited liquidity can reverse just as quickly, often leaving retail investors bearing the greatest losses.