US Treasury Sued Over Data Access Granted to Elon Musk’s DOGE

U.S. Treasury Department faces a lawsuit alleging unlawful disclosure of sensitive personal and financial information to Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The lawsuit, filed on February 3, 2025, in a Washington, D.C. federal court, accuses Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent of violating federal laws by granting DOGE access to the Treasury’s payment systems.

Unions Challenge Data Sharing

The plaintiffs, including the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), the Alliance for Retired Americans, the American Federation of Government Employees, and the Service Employees International Union, argue that this access breaches the Privacy Act of 1974. They contend that the Treasury’s actions have led to an “unlawful ongoing, systematic, and continuous disclosure of personal and financial information” to Musk and his team.

“The scale of the intrusion into individuals’ privacy is massive and unprecedented,” the AFL-CIO stated. “People who must share information with the federal government should not be forced to share information with Elon Musk or his ‘DOGE.'”

US Treasury Sued Over Sensitive Data Release

The lawsuit highlights that the Treasury’s payment system contains extensive personal data, including names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, home addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and bank account information of millions of Americans. The unions express deep concern over the potential misuse of this data, emphasizing that individuals should not have their sensitive information exposed to external entities without explicit consent.

Political Reactions and Legislative Responses

The legal action has sparked significant political reactions. Senator Ron Wyden has been vocal about his concerns, stating that sources informed his office that “Bessent has granted DOGE *full* access” to the Treasury’s payment system. He has demanded answers from Secretary Bessent regarding the extent of DOGE’s access and the safeguards in place to protect citizens’ data.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced plans to introduce legislation aimed at restricting unauthorized access to federal payment systems. “DOGE is not a real government agency,” Schumer asserted. “It has no authority to make spending decisions. It has no authority to shut programs down or ignore federal law.” Senator Elizabeth Warren also expressed alarm, stating that the system “is now at the mercy of Elon Musk,” who “has the power to suck out all that information for his own use.”

Treasury Department’s Response

As of now, the Treasury Department and the U.S. Digital Service (USDS), the parent agency of DOGE, have not issued official comments regarding the lawsuit. The lack of response has further fueled concerns about transparency and accountability within the department.

Background on DOGE

President Donald Trump appointed Elon Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency as part of his initiative to streamline federal operations and reduce government spending. DOGE, seemingly an homage to Dogecoin—a cryptocurrency Musk has previously mentioned—has been tasked with identifying and eliminating wasteful expenditures within federal agencies.

Legal and Ethical Implications

The lawsuit raises critical questions about the balance between governmental efficiency and the protection of individual privacy rights. Legal experts suggest that the case could set a precedent for how personal data is handled by government agencies and the extent to which external entities can access such information.

Public Outcry and Future Developments

Public reaction to the lawsuit has been intense, with many citizens expressing concern over the potential misuse of their personal information. Privacy advocates are closely monitoring the case, emphasizing the need for stringent safeguards to protect individual data from unauthorized access.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the case is expected to have significant implications for data privacy policies and the oversight of government agencies. The outcome could influence future decisions regarding the sharing of sensitive information with external entities and the measures required to ensure compliance with federal privacy laws. The lawsuit against the U.S. Treasury Department underscores the ongoing tension between efforts to improve governmental efficiency and the imperative to protect individual privacy rights. As the case progresses, it will serve as a critical test of the legal frameworks governing data access and the accountability of government officials in safeguarding citizens’ personal information. Get more from The Bit Gazette