Boris Johnson calls Bitcoin a “giant Ponzi scheme” in Daily Mail column

Boris Johnson, the former prime minister of the United Kingdom, has described Bitcoin as a ‘giant Ponzi scheme’ that depends on a constant supply of new investors, according to a column published in the Daily Mail.

The remarks—Johnson’s most explicit criticism of cryptocurrency to date—triggered immediate pushback from prominent Bitcoin advocates including Michael Saylor of MicroStrategy and Eric Trump, who argued the characterization fundamentally misunderstands how decentralized networks operate. The clash reignites a long-standing debate about Bitcoin’s economic foundations and whether its price growth is sustainable.

“I have always suspected from the outset that all cryptocurrencies were basically a Ponzi scheme,” Johnson wrote.

“Like all such schemes, they depend on a constant supply of new and credulous investors.” — Boris Johnson, former UK Prime Minister.

The Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate has persisted since the cryptocurrency’s launch in 2009, with critics periodically raising concerns about speculation and market volatility.

Supporters reject Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate claims

Advocates of Bitcoin strongly rejected Johnson’s interpretation of the technology, arguing that the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate mischaracterizes how decentralized networks function.

Michael Saylor, executive chairman of Strategy (MicroStrategy) and one of the largest corporate holders of Bitcoin, responded publicly to the criticism.

“Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme […] has no issuer, no promoter, and no guaranteed return—just an open, decentralized monetary network driven by code and market demand.” — Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman, Strategy.

Saylor’s response emphasized that, unlike traditional Ponzi schemes, Bitcoin does not promise fixed returns or rely on a centralized operator distributing funds from new investors.

Eric Trump, a business executive and co-founder of American Bitcoin Corp, also dismissed the criticism.

“Totally disagree.” Eric Trump, Co-founder and Chief Strategy Officer, American Bitcoin Corp.

The comments illustrate how the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate continues to divide political leaders, financial analysts, and participants in the digital asset sector.

Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate expands across online investor communities

The Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate has also spread across online investment communities, where some participants have argued that the digital asset more closely resembles a pyramid structure rather than a classic Ponzi scheme.

Users on the social platform Reddit have discussed the economic model behind Bitcoin, debating whether its price growth depends primarily on continued investor adoption.

One participant argued that “pyramid schemes are based on network marketing,” suggesting that the expansion of Bitcoin’s user base resembles such dynamics.

Another commenter described the system as a “greater fool scheme,” referring to the theory that investors profit by selling an asset to someone else willing to pay a higher price.

These discussions demonstrate how the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate has evolved beyond political commentary to include grassroots analysis from retail investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts.

Fact-checking notes on the social platform X (Twitter) also challenged Johnson’s claims, pointing out that the structural characteristics of Ponzi schemes differ from decentralized cryptocurrencies.

Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate contrasts cryptocurrency with gold

Johnson’s argument also drew comparisons between Bitcoin and traditional stores of value such as precious metals.

In his column, he suggested that assets like gold or collectible items maintain value partly because of their historical appeal and physical characteristics.

By contrast, he described Bitcoin as lacking intrinsic value, characterizing it as “a string of numbers stored in a series of computers.”

The Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate therefore reflects broader disagreements about what constitutes value in modern financial systems.

Supporters argue that Bitcoin’s scarcity, security, and decentralized governance provide a foundation for long-term value, while critics contend that its price depends largely on investor sentiment.

Despite the ongoing controversy surrounding the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate, the cryptocurrency remains widely traded in global markets.

Market data from CoinMarketCap shows Bitcoin trading above $70,000 in early March 2026, even as broader financial markets experienced volatility linked to geopolitical tensions.

Corporate adoption also continues. Strategy currently holds approximately 738,731 BTC in its treasury, representing around 3.52% of Bitcoin’s total supply of 21 million coins.

Meanwhile, American Bitcoin Corp, associated with Eric Trump, has accumulated more than 6,500 BTC as part of its corporate treasury strategy.

As debates over the cryptocurrency’s economic model continue, the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme debate remains a central question in discussions about the future of digital finance.