- Trending
- Comments
- Latest
Bitsgap says 56.1% of the 224,057 completed trading bot runs on its platform between January and June 2026 closed in profit, according to a company analysis published on November 10, 2026. That leaves 43.9% that did not, in a sample the company says excludes unfinished runs, deposits under $100 and outliers.
The findings offer insight into how different automated strategies performed within the platform’s historical trading sample, highlighting the influence of strategy selection, position management and exit decisions on trading outcomes.
However, Bitsgap cautioned that the results do not guarantee future profitability, particularly as cryptocurrency markets remain exposed to price volatility and changing market conditions.
The analysis identified notable differences between the performance of Bitsgap’s automated trading strategies.
DCA bots recorded profitable closes in 54.5% of completed sessions, while COMBO bots achieved a higher rate of 65.3%.
The COMBO strategy combines grid trading with dollar-cost averaging and operates in the futures market. Its design allows traders to automate orders based on different market movements rather than relying exclusively on price increases.
Bitsgap also examined how deposit sizes and trading durations corresponded with profitable outcomes.
Among DCA users, sessions funded with deposits between $500 and $1,000 and maintained for seven to 30 days recorded a 60.7% profitable-close rate.
COMBO sessions funded with deposits ranging from $5,000 to $10,000 achieved a 75.2% profitable-close rate, the highest among the specific groups highlighted in the report.
These figures, however, do not establish that larger deposits automatically produce better trading results. They represent historical outcomes from selected groups of completed sessions and do not demonstrate a direct causal relationship between investment size and profitability.
One of the key distinctions in Bitsgap’s analysis is the flexibility of its COMBO bot, which supports both long and short futures configurations.
Traditional spot DCA strategies gradually build exposure by purchasing an asset at different price levels. Their performance generally depends on subsequent price movements and how traders manage their positions.
Futures strategies offer another approach by allowing traders to position themselves for either rising or declining markets.
A long position seeks to benefit from price increases, while a short position aims to generate returns when an asset’s price falls.
Bitsgap’s COMBO bot combines grid and DCA orders to automate these strategies. Users can configure leverage, take-profit targets and stop-loss settings according to their trading preferences.
However, the flexibility of futures trading introduces additional risks.
Short positions can generate losses when prices rise unexpectedly, while leverage magnifies both potential gains and losses. Depending on market movements and position settings, traders can lose substantial amounts of their invested capital.
Although Crypto Trading Bots can automate repetitive trading activities, they do not eliminate market risk or the need for informed decision-making.
Users remain responsible for selecting their market exposure, configuring trading parameters and monitoring their positions as conditions change.
Beyond strategy selection, Bitsgap’s analysis examined how trading sessions were closed and the relationship between exit decisions and profitability.
The company found that bot runs launched through its AI Assistant and closed using take-profit recorded a 67.7% profitable-close rate.
By comparison, manually closed sessions recorded a 38.9% rate.
The difference highlights the importance of exit strategies when assessing automated trading performance. However, it does not establish that enabling take-profit settings directly increases profitability by the reported margin.
Traders may manually close positions because they are already experiencing losses, responding to unexpected market developments or adjusting their exposure to changing conditions.
Another important consideration is that profitable-close rates do not reveal the size of individual gains and losses.
A strategy could close numerous trades with small profits while sustaining occasional substantial losses. Consequently, a high percentage of profitable sessions does not necessarily translate into positive overall account returns.
For anyone considering Crypto Trading Bots, evaluating the balance between gains, losses, trading fees and exposure to market volatility remains essential.
Bitsgap’s findings provide a snapshot of automated cryptocurrency trading performance based on activity recorded on its platform during the first six months of 2026.
The company excluded unfinished sessions, deposits below $100 and statistical outliers from its analysis of 224,057 completed bot runs.
This means the results reflect a selected sample rather than the experience of every platform user or all possible trading conditions.
The figures also do not establish how the strategies would perform during prolonged market downturns, sudden price movements or periods of reduced liquidity.
Meanwhile, Bitsgap announced a 50% discount on eligible annual subscription plans from November 20 to November 30, alongside a seven-day free trial.
The promotional offer provides an opportunity for prospective users to explore the platform, although subscription costs, trading capital and exchange fees remain separate considerations.
Ultimately, the analysis suggests that Crypto Trading Bots can help traders execute structured strategies, but their historical performance should be assessed alongside the risks and limitations of automated cryptocurrency trading.
About Bitsgap
Bitsgap develops cryptocurrency trading automation tools for spot and futures markets. Its platform allows users to configure trading strategies, automate order execution and monitor trading activity across connected cryptocurrency exchanges.
More information is available on Bitsgap’s official website.
Copyright © 2025 - The Bit Gazette.
